PubMed COVID-19 Clinical Care

BACKGROUND: While research has been conducted on the availability, accessibility, and affordability of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, little information is available on the ways in which health

CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus^(®)) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820642.].

CONCLUSIONS: Despite emergencies like the pandemic, the students' future should not be ignored. They need practical education for future work. There is a need for better strategies for improved learning so that future doctors may work efficiently in

CONCLUSION: Most students had experience in digital learning, in which the use of smart phones with cellular data was the most common mode of digital learning during the pandemic.

CONTEXT: In the replication of SARS-CoV-2, the main protease (Mpro/3CLpro) is significant. It is conserved in a number of novel coronavirus variations, and no known human proteases share its cleavage sites. Therefore, 3CLpro is an ideal target. In

Antigen test kits (ATK) are extensively utilized for screening and diagnosing COVID-19 because they are easy to operate. However, ATKs exhibit poor sensitivity and cannot detect low concentrations of SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we present a new, highly

Background: Stressful events during a pandemic are a major cause of serious health problems, such as burnout, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among health care workers (HCWs). During three years, HCWs, on the frontline to fight

CONCLUSION: An extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with additional radiation therapy for Ewing sarcoma provided extra local control and allowed limb salvage.

During the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services implemented a little-known public health law, referred to as "Title 42." The law immediately received criticism from public health